does not mention "copy" at all) so that people might be confused in the future when reading your reference to the old dialog.Python is a programming language that it relatively easy to learn and understand. You can do more things, but the wording and appearance is quite different (e.g. Please have a look at the new copy dialog in V0.19 (see screenshots, they appear when you press "Ctrl-C" in the tree.), maybe its a good thing to already include it.Are there some penalties for enlarging the scope of the sketch to "other parts and free objects" and enabling the use of cross-references? I am asking because I found that projecting geometry into a sketch is fragile to changes (due to Topological Naming I guess), so linking to other sketches underneath might be a better way, gerenally.Is there a way to see in the model tree whether or not a sketch is a cross-referenced sketch? To me they look the same.I tested the cross-referenced master sketch approach in a quick model and it seemed to work fine without a shape binder. It was not clear to me why you introduce a shape binder.I found I could apply some of your proposals directly to several of my little projects. As a still starting FreeCAD user I would love to see advanced issues like that to appear in the wiki, thanks a lot for your efforts! For me your wording is good to understand and the process is overall well explained. Let me know what you think, and if I'm going against other FreeCAD best I like the tutuorial very much. In this case, the chair legs are boxes with a height that goes up to the bottom of the seat, wherever the seat bottom is, and in the cross section of the reference sketch. In my humble opinion, cross references are a must for CAD design, because they let you have several parts dependent on each other in powerful ways.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |